[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15121384#comment-15121384
 ] 

Sam Ruby commented on WHIMSY-43:
--------------------------------

It should be removed: 
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/whimsical-dev/201511.mbox/%3CE2EA4A6A-7883-4E2D-9AB1-0CCB419DFB7F%40porterclan.net%3E

Any takers?  :-)

cc: [~brettporter]

> Change Audit is misleading
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: WHIMSY-43
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-43
>             Project: Whimsy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> The Change Audit at the end of a committee roster may show where the joining 
> data in committee-info.txt does not agree with the mail archives.
> For example
> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/attic
> currently says
> Potentially mismatched dates: Edward O'Neil committee-info.txt: 2010-01-10, 
> estimate from archives: 2010-01-15
> Potentially mismatched dates: Henk P. Penning committee-info.txt: 2014-07-10, 
> estimate from archives: 2014-06-15
> The archive date for Edward O'Neill is reasonable, because the ACK mail was 
> sent 2010-01-12.
> Although the mail for Henk was sent on 2014-06-12, the suggested correction 
> is misleading, as the process changed to using a NOTICE mail, and the date of 
> joining is now the date when CI is first updated. This cannot be before 
> NOTICE + 3 days, but may be days or weeks later. In this case, Henk was added 
> to CI in r50811 on 2014-07-11 at 02:47, so the date needs to be 2014-07-11 or 
>  2014-07-10 (allowing for US timezone). This is nearly a month later than the 
> suggested value.
> The code needs to take account of the rule change which occurred on June 19, 
> 2013:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_06_19.txt
>  (7G)
> It may be tricky to establish when the CI file was updated, in which case the 
> text should make it clear that the joining date cannot be before the archive 
> date but could be much later.
> There is another problem: the dates from CI seem to be quite stale; Attic was 
> changed a day or so ago.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to