On 7 March 2016 at 19:25, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does it make sense to filters these auto messages? > > I don't believe that LDAP failover, for example, should generate a > message. I've suggested two solutions: not use "warning" for that, or > changing it so that warning doesn't generate a message. I leave it up > to Sebb to decide which is best for the tools that he has been > primarily focused on: i.e., public_json.
I don't think PMB needs to report on warnings. However equally I don't think they should be lost to history once the next job runs or the next warning occurs. This means keeping some kind of log of the events; PMB has been performing that role so far, though it's not ideal. At present we keep only the current log, and archive it if there is a warning or higher. This only preserves the latest warning for each job. > - Sam Ruby > >>> On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Ping My Box <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) seems to >>> be back in working order again. >>> >>> With regards, >>> Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/ >>
