On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:40 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > At present, non-members are flagged with "Not in members.txt" which is > fine, but the text is in red. > That seems wrong; it's not an error to not be a member.
It certainly was a surprise to me to find non-members in the ASF member group. And to the secretary too; particularly as there have been periodic suggestions to replace members.txt with LDAP. I would like those differences to continue to be highlighted. If we can find an automated way to distinguish between those that were intentionally added despite not being a member and unexplainable differences, then perhaps a different color would be warranted. There are LDAP entries in ou=services that could be used. The cn value for this service is one that the infrastructure team would prefer not be widely displayed; you can see it mentioned in groups.html.rb as a name to skip over when displaying groups. But first, it would be helpful to have the infrastructure team as well as the secretary confirm the intent here. > Maybe this crept in with the recent code re-org; I don't remember > noticing it earlier git blame is your friend: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blame/master/www/roster/views/members.html.rb - Sam Ruby
