On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > ...Perhaps the content of the emails should contain a standard footer > > that says that questions can be addressed either by responding to the > > email (for urgent matters) or by addressing the feedback in the next > > scheduled report (for all other matters)?... > > +1 > > And maybe send the feedback emails from secretary@ if that's easy, to > make things clearer. > > We want a dialog between the board and the project, not necessarily > between this months' shepherd and the project, so having the email > from "the board" via the secretary is fine. Or from board@ from that > matter. > > This all makes sense and personally I like the push of comments to email. Now that you know this will happen, maybe if an answer is required/expected, the comment itself indicates this? Then my original question becomes moot on future comments. > -Bertrand >
