On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Craig Russell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Working now. Google second level security wanted me to approve “less secure 
> application”.
>
> Seems to work now.
>
> W00t.

Cool.  I'd lick to rip out some dead code then.  You might want to
delete ~/.secmail ... it will fall back to secmail.rb, meaning that
any changes to signatures and the like will get checked in and remain
consistent

> Craig

- Sam Ruby

>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> _ERROR #<Net::SMTPAuthenticationError: 534-5.7.14 
>> <https://accounts.google.com/signin/continue?sarp=1&scc=1&plt=AKgnsbsw: 
>> /Users/clr/apache/git/whimsy/www/secretary/workbench/file.cgi, referer: 
>> http://whimsy.local/secretary/workbench/file.cgi
>>
>> ---
>>     :svn:
>>     - /Users/clr/apache/foundation
>>     - /Users/clr/apache/documents
>>     - /Users/clr/apache/committers
>>
>>     :sendmail:
>>      delivery_method: smtp
>>      address: smtp.gmail.com
>>      port: 587
>>      domain: apache.org
>>      user_name: '[email protected]'
>>      password: ’noyb'
>>      authentication: plain
>>      enable_starttls_auto: true
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Craig Russell
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I don’t understand why it’s trying localhost 25 when I specifically asked 
>>>> for smtp.gmail.com 587.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that.  I know what is going on.
>>>
>>> Create a ~/.whimsy file and put in it:
>>>
>>> :sendmail:
>>> delivery_method: smtp
>>> address: smtp.gmail.com
>>> port: 587
>>> domain: apache.org
>>> user_name: username
>>> password: password
>>> authentication: plain
>>> enable_starttls_auto: true
>>>
>>> Background: secretary/workbench is the oldest whimsy tool and has its
>>> own configuration (~/.secassist, ~/.secmail).  Over time, I saw a lot
>>> of commonality in configuration and made that common (~/.whimsy) but
>>> didn't update secretary/workbench.   Then when mail wasn't working on
>>> whimsy-vm3, I made a fix to the common code and instead of making a
>>> separate fix to the workbench, I updated it to use the common mail
>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> So: same information, different place, slightly different format; but
>>> on the brighter side this same information will be used by all of the
>>> whimsy tools that send email.
>>>
>>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect
>> [email protected]
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect
> [email protected]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to