On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we have a bigger problem than I thought with missing iclas. > > Two of the recent missing iclas are from folks who were processed in October > 2016, one by Sam and one by me. > > If you look at svn history for October 4 and compare iclas.txt with > documents/iclas you will find that we processed an icla but it never got > committed to documents/iclas. Same for October 10. > > If anyone has any insights here please let me know.
Very odd, given that the secmail tool (and the workbench before it) shows you what operation it will be performing before it does so, shows you the actual results from the command, and stops processing should the svn commit command return a non-zero return code. > Craig > > Craig L Russell > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo - Sam Ruby
