On 7 June 2017 at 21:05, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote:
> sebb wrote on 6/7/17 3:34 PM:
>> cttee1 = ASF::Committee.preload
>> cttee2 = ASF::Committee.load_committee_info
>>
>>
>> cttee1 gets the LDAP committee info
>>
>> cttee2 gets info from committee-info.txt
>
> I think the underlying issue is having sufficiently organized and
> explanatory developer docs about the ASF module so that new developers
> can figure out how best to use the models, which offer a lot of data.
>
> The whimsy environment is powerful because it has direct access to all
> sorts of great ASF data.  But for a new developer, it's not easy to
> figure out if you should try pulling from an ASF::* class by the API,
> read one of the public_*.json files, or read the source directly
> yourself.  Similarly, we now have enough developers and independent
> tools that changes in the ASF:: classes and elsewhere may affect other
> developers.
>
> There certainly are code examples scattered around, but I still just
> voodoo-copypastaed this line from officers/acreq.cgi when I needed a
> list of TLP PMC names:
>
> pmcs = ASF::Committee.list.map(&:name).sort - NON_PMC_UNIX_GROUPS

I replaced it with ASF::Committee.load_committee_info because the LDAP
Committee class does not have the correct capitalisation.
Nor is the list of LDAP committee groups the canonical list of PMCs.

> For my case, I don't care about details or even data freshness: I simply
> want the fastest accurate list of all TLP names, (and separately, the
> accurate list of current podling names).

In which case committee-info.json would be sufficient.
[One can use the approach in the collate-minutes script which loads
the local copy if present, and fetches the URL if not.]

> - Do we have a preferred ruby class doc style?
>
> - Is there anything else really important to document besides the ASF::
> gem/classes and the content/structure of the public*.json files (which
> are used by other websites now too)?

That's really a separate issue.

>>
>> I find this rather confusing, and it seems to me that it is
>> error-prone and a bit of a maintenance headache, because the Committee
>> class is now defined in multiple files. If the same method name is
>> defined in two classes, which one will be used? I suspect it will
>> depend on the order the files are loaded.
>>
>> Similar considerations apply to the Person class
>>
>
>
> --
>
> - Shane
>   https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources

Reply via email to