[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shane Curcuru resolved WHIMSY-36.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Implemented

Since the listed file is no longer in whimsy, this doesn't seem relevant.  
Plus, the officers/acreq.cgi tool seems to be using the right data now.

> icla.rb / public_icla_info.rb should handle entries with no ICLA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WHIMSY-36
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-36
>             Project: Whimsy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> The script submit-account-request.rb looks for
> {code}
> /^notinavail:.*?:(.*?):(.*?):Signed CLA/
> {code}
> when providing suggestions for new accounts
> The icla processing scripts should behave in a similar way when extracting 
> info from the file. The output JSON file should distinguish which entries 
> have a valid ICLA for both committers and non-committers. This will mean 
> changes to the file syntax.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to