On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:21 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 May 2018 at 00:10, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:59 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The committer screen only shows forms on file for those that are >>> currently members. >>> >>> Surely at least the ICLA link should be shown for non-members? >> >> I don't think so. >> >> Here are the list of people who can access those documents, from >> pit-authorization-template >> >> [/documents] >> @member = rw >> @legal = rw >> @pmc-chairs = rw >> @staff = rw >> @svnadmins = rw >> whimsysvn = r >> * = >> >> Adding pmc-chairs is defensible, but adding all committers will simply >> provide them with a link that they can't follow. > > The problem is that some people are using Whimsy to determine whether > or not an ICLA has been filed. > > Would it be OK to provide the status, but disable the link (this will > also hide the filename, which may provide private info)? > If so, should we only show the ICLA status?
I'm confused. The set of people who have filed an ICLA is supposed to be a proper superset of the set of committers. Put another way: if you find a committer using whimsy, you should assume that an ICLA has been filed. But not finding a committer using whimsy does NOT imply that an ICLA has not been filed. - Sam Ruby
