On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 00:46, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 7:34 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The 'rake update' command restarts Passenger apps that have changed > > since the last update. > > > > It then goes on the update the Gems. > > ... and my touch restart.txt again.
I'd overlooked that > > That seems a bit odd: would it not be better to update the Gems first, > > so any restarted apps pick up the new Gems? > > Gem install may take a while. Most of the time, no new gems are required. > > Put another way, with the current dual approach, changes that you push > will be deployed quicker, and in the somewhat rare case that the > deploy fails due to missing a dependency, things will straighten > themselves out in minutes. I see, thanks > > The task comment says: > > '# update gems and restart applications as needed' > > i.e. the reverse order > > And later you will find the following: > > # if new gems were istalled and this directory contains a passenger > # application, restart it > > (and, yes, there is a typo in that comment) > > > Sebb > > - Sam Ruby
