Try the following:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/__self__

Text can be adjusted if necessary

On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 15:42, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 13:11, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> >
> > sebb wrote on 9/18/23 6:17 PM:
> > > On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 20:18, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi, whimsy folks,
> > >> Could you please remove the GitHub ID field from the whimsy roster 
> > >> service?
> > >> The field is not canonical/authoritative, and mostly just serves to 
> > >> confuse new committers these days. The only authoritative place for 
> > >> GitHub IDs is through https://gitbox.apache.org/boxer/
> >
> > If this is causing problems for Infra, we absolutely need to at least
> > clearly annotate the field, and provide a link to gitbox, to ensure
> > users don't keep asking questions in the wrong place.
>
> I would be interested to know how many of the Ids in Whimsy differ
> from the ones tied to ASF accounts?
>
> > > The GitHub ids in Whimsy are provided by their owners, so can be
> > > considered authoritative, even if they might not be the ones that are
> > > linked to ASF accounts.
> > > I am told that people find them useful.
> > >
> > > Maybe a solution would be to add a note that the id might not be the
> > > one that is linked to the ASF id.
> > > Even better would be if the boxer system could validate which GH Id is
> > > being used for linking?
> >
> > Having GitHub ID in whimsy is useful, because many committers know it as
> > a place to find information about accounts.  However, we should
> > deprecate/document any fields that have specific ties to other systems,
> > especially which ones are authoritative either for viewing or writing.
> >
> > Proposal: Leave a "user supplied githubid" field here, with a clear note
> > about how it gets populated.  Some new committers may not have tied them
> > together yet, and will be curious.
> >
> > Also have a "GitBox Registered GH ID" field or the like, which is
> > read-only and just pulls whatever gitbox tells us, and if you click on
> > it, takes you to the gitbox login or register screen.
> >
> > If we just delete it completely from whimsy, some committers will wonder
> > where it went.
>
> Indeed, and that may result in more confusion and complaints than is
> currently seen by Infra.
>
> > Does that make sense?
>
> OK by me.
>
> >
> > --
> > - Shane
> >    Whimsy PMC
> >    The Apache Software Foundation
> >

Reply via email to