On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 01:47, sebbaz(Test) <sebbaz+t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 at 16:28, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > > > > In reviewing the June agenda, there are several projects listed as > > reporting that don't need to report, due to WHIMSY-415 somehow.
I don't think that is the cause. > > This includes Submarine, which was resolutioned to the Attic in May as > > Special Order 7A. Submarine was removed from committee-info.txt AFTER the agenda was created. >> So researching which project reports we don't > > actually need now in June led me to cross-check what the Roster tool > > says about various projects - and I realized: there's no > > whimsy.a.o/roster/attic/ listing! > > > > - Why doesn't public/committee-retired.json include URLs? It would be > > super-useful to have a link to the existing homepage there. > > Raise an JIRA request. > > > - Does anyone have any tips/energy to make a super-simple roster/attic > > service, so this is easy for humans to discover when looking at our > > rosters? I'd definitely call this roster/attic, to explicitly list > > things that the Attic thinks they own, rather than just "retired" which > > might be thought of including other retired things (like failed podlings > > or petri groups somehow). > > What are the qualifications for a project to appear in this listing? > > > - Why does roster/other still list Flume and Submarine? > > As the page header says, this is because the LDAP project groups still exist. > > > Is there a bug > > or cleanup needed in Whimsy here, or is something in Attic-land not > > properly marked as done/finalized/whatever? > > > > -- > > - Shane > > Member > > The Apache Software Foundation
