[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13146989#comment-13146989
 ] 

Alex Heneveld commented on WHIRR-415:
-------------------------------------

Personally I don't like overloading {{tarball.url}} in this way.

What if we had a more general mechanism for allowing environment variables to 
be specified in the config file?

I am thinking something like:

{code}
env.someVar=value
{code}

Then {{SOME_VAR=value}} is exported and available to the scripts, so we could 
say {{env.repo=cdh3u1}} to solve this problem.

Interested to know people's thoughts, if this is a good idea, if 
{{env.SOME_VAR}} syntax is more intuitive (and if this should be a separate 
jira).
                
> Let users specify the CDH release (cdh3u1, cdh3u2)
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WHIRR-415
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-415
>             Project: Whirr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: service/cdh
>            Reporter: Andrei Savu
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: WHIRR-415.patch
>
>
> Allow explicit selection of the CDH release you want to use. The current 
> behaviour is to use the latest one. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to