Thanks Patrick! Sounds good to have a bylaws page. I will open an issue.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > We've always gone by the 72 hr rule (in whirr and other projects I'm on): > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-manager > > However I notice that there's no such mention in the release faq: > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > Although it does talk about it here: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > I'd suggest we go with the 72 hr rule. Might be a good idea to codify > the rules with explicit bylaws like pig/zk and others have done: > http://zookeeper.apache.org/bylaws.html > (see the bottom of that page) > > Patrick > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> The only difference from RC0 is: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-449 >> >> Can we move forward and make the release public as soon as we get 3 >> +1's from PMC? >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This is the second release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.7.0. >>> >>> It fixes the following issues: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311110&version=12317571 >>> >>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 19. >>> >>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided >>> for convenience. >>> >>> Source and binary files: >>> http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.7.0-candidate-1/ >>> >>> Maven staging repo: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-339/ >>> >>> The tag to be voted upon: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/tags/release-0.7.0 >>> >>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/whirr/dist/KEYS
