Hi all, quick update on jclouds-virtualbox.
The provider is still on labs, but after the last improvements, I've been able to successfully start up to 30 guests on my laptop without problems. I've also tested the jclouds-virtualbox provider with Apache Whirr: bin/whirr launch-cluster --config recipes/zookeeper.properties --private-key-file ~/.ssh/id_rsa_whirr --template osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=12.04 where $ cat recipes/zookeeper.properties # # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. # # # Deploy an Apache ZooKeeper cluster # whirr.cluster-name=zookeeper whirr.instance-templates=3 zookeeper whirr.bootstrap-user=toor:password with default ram size for the guests 1024 Mb, and everything seems to be in good shape. I think it is a good result :) If you are interested in having more details, feel free to ping me. Thanks everyone for great team work particularly Adrian Cole, David Alves, Mattias Holmqvist, Andrei Savu, Tony Batchelli, Andrew Bayer and Patrick Debois. Ciao, Andrea On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > haha baby steps. > > -A > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'd try using that >>> in a different package. Ex. a LOT of the code is the same, regardless >>> of which api is used (ex. image construction, guest additions, etc), >>> so maybe make a package org.jclouds.virtualbox.xpcom and put things >>> like a ComputeServiceAdapter that uses xpcom? >>> >>> wdyt? >> >> >> I agree with the idea of having a different package: at the moment I'm using >> a simple eclipse project to test things. >> Unfortunately even if xpcom seems faster than SOAP and doesn't require a >> running vbox web server (good) >> the session reliability is still a problem with xpcom bridge as well. >> >> Maybe we could start a brave implementation of a third bridge: native :) >> >> wdyt? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jclouds-dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jclouds-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >
