Hi David, we need your feedback!
Andrea On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:35 PM, David Alves <davidral...@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome work Andrea! > Looking forward to trying it. > > -david > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Finally the new vboxjws jar has been promoted to maven central >> >> I've submitted a new PR with the latest jar >> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.virtualbox%7Cvboxjws%7C4.2.0-80737%7Cjar >> >> that contains the right license. >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> nice! >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> after another IRC chat with vbox developers, maybe things are clearing up. >>>> >>>> The real license for vobxjws.jar is specified here >>>> https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Main/webservice/MANIFEST.MF.in >>>> in particular http://glassfish.java.net/nonav/public/CDDL+GPL.html >>>> >>>> CDDL is extremely liberal and should be compatible with asl (if you >>>> know more please shout) >>>> >>>> jclouds-virtualbox can use vboxjws.jar as-is, even if I need to >>>> rebundle and push to maven central the updated pom with the correct >>>> license. >>>> >>>> Thanks all for your help, >>>> Andrea >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Patrick Debois <patrick.deb...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> you might want to check the wsdl integration of virtualbox i once >>>>> experimented with >>>>> see at the bottom of >>>>> http://www.jedi.be/blog/2009/11/17/controlling-virtual-machines-with-an-API/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 08 Oct 2012, at 19:00, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Patrick, >>>>> >>>>> the ssh trick can totally help. >>>>> >>>>> Parsing is not the only problem: >>>>> without the stub, all the domain classes are gone, so I need to recreate >>>>> all >>>>> the pojo classes by hand (IMachine, INetworkAdapter etc) >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Andrea >>>>> >>>>> Il giorno 08/ott/2012 17:46, "Patrick Debois" <patrick.deb...@gmail.com> >>>>> ha >>>>> scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> ssh overhead can be minimized by using something like ssh contro session, >>>>>> where all your subsequent ssh connection happen over an established ssh >>>>>> tunnel. see ssh controlpath >>>>>> >>>>>> many of the ssh command like status have a way to have the output in >>>>>> machinereadable output, so parsing is pretty easy. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08 Oct 2012, at 17:23, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Brian for your help! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Even if ssh approach looks reasonable to me as well I've 2 main >>>>>>> concerns: >>>>>>> 1. the overhead introduced by each ssh call >>>>>>> 2. ssh invoking is fine, but retrieving (parsing) the responses can be >>>>>>> a a very hard and painful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Brian McCallister <bri...@skife.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sure I'll add this information to the jclouds-virtualbox >>>>>>>>> documentation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yesterday Ioannis was adding the vritualbox api to the jclouds-karaf >>>>>>>>> features that are used by jclouds-cli, so that we can use virtualbox >>>>>>>>> from the cli. >>>>>>>>> He noticed that vboxjws is LGPL2 licensed which is not compatible with >>>>>>>>> the ASL license. So he thinks that it is not possible package it >>>>>>>>> inside the cli itself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is a big problem for jclouds and whirr in general, I guess, so we >>>>>>>>> need to find a solution. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ioannis was suggesting to ask Oracle to relicense the jar >>>>>>>>> Technically it is also possible to avoid the usage of vbox web service >>>>>>>>> and either ssh to host machine and run the vbox command on it >>>>>>>>> (vagrant/veewee approach) or use java native approach to run the C++ >>>>>>>>> vbox commands. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SSH into the remote machine and run vbox sounds pretty reasonable. The >>>>>>>> main alternative would be to write your own wrapper which invokes the >>>>>>>> command line tool, and listens on http(s) or something. In that case >>>>>>>> you still need to connect to a remote machine, and now you have >>>>>>>> another daemon process to monitor, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are many decent ssh options available, I have found sshj ( >>>>>>>> https://github.com/shikhar/sshj ) to be pleasant to use if you want >>>>>>>> pure ssh, or I have a little convenience wrapper around shelling out >>>>>>>> to command line ssh ( https://github.com/brianm/ssh-java-wrapper ) if >>>>>>>> you prefer that model. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Brian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for going through the process of getting the jar on the way to >>>>>>>>>> maven, Andrea! Can you summarize what that was in case it needs to >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> done again? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -A >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrea Turli >>>>>>>>>> <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I've uploaded the vboxjws-4.2.0 to >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central-sync/org/virtualbox/vboxjws/4.2.0/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So now jclouds-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT is using the last virtualbox version >>>>>>>>>>> which seems much better in terms of session management. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Andrea Turli >>>>>>>>>>> <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've updated the jclouds-virtualbox implementation to the latest >>>>>>>>>>>> release 4.2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here you can find more details about the status >>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=384 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm now waiting for an answer from virtualbox developers about >>>>>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>> available vboxjws-4.2.0.jar available on maven central, >>>>>>>>>>>> to push this new version. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andrea Turli >>>>>>>>>>>> <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> quick update on jclouds-virtualbox. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The provider is still on labs, but after the last improvements, >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to successfully start up to 30 guests on my laptop >>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've also tested the jclouds-virtualbox provider with Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>> Whirr: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bin/whirr launch-cluster --config recipes/zookeeper.properties >>>>>>>>>>>>> --private-key-file ~/.ssh/id_rsa_whirr --template >>>>>>>>>>>>> osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=12.04 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> where $ cat recipes/zookeeper.properties >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or >>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> # this work for additional information regarding copyright >>>>>>>>>>>>> ownership. >>>>>>>>>>>>> # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Version 2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, >>>>>>>>>>>>> software >>>>>>>>>>>>> # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" >>>>>>>>>>>>> BASIS, >>>>>>>>>>>>> # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or >>>>>>>>>>>>> implied. >>>>>>>>>>>>> # See the License for the specific language governing permissions >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> # limitations under the License. >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> # Deploy an Apache ZooKeeper cluster >>>>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>>> whirr.cluster-name=zookeeper >>>>>>>>>>>>> whirr.instance-templates=3 zookeeper >>>>>>>>>>>>> whirr.bootstrap-user=toor:password >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with default ram size for the guests 1024 Mb, and everything seems >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> be in good shape. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it is a good result :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are interested in having more details, feel free to ping >>>>>>>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for great team work particularly >>>>>>>>>>>>> Adrian Cole, David Alves, Mattias Holmqvist, Andrei Savu, Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>> Batchelli, Andrew Bayer and Patrick Debois. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ciao, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Adrian Cole >>>>>>>>>>>>> <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> haha baby steps. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -A >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Andrea Turli >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd try using that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a different package. Ex. a LOT of the code is the same, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regardless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of which api is used (ex. image construction, guest additions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so maybe make a package org.jclouds.virtualbox.xpcom and put >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like a ComputeServiceAdapter that uses xpcom? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with the idea of having a different package: at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment I'm using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a simple eclipse project to test things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately even if xpcom seems faster than SOAP and doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running vbox web server (good) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the session reliability is still a problem with xpcom bridge as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we could start a brave implementation of a third bridge: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> native :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>>>> Groups "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>>> Groups "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "jclouds-dev" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "jclouds-dev" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >>>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jclouds-dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jclouds-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to jclouds-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jclouds-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en. >
