On 7/29/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure we can't do that transparently unless we do some > bytecode magic.
Well, I didn't want to say 'bytecode' as before you know it Igor starts calling me a byte code fan :). > As for bind(); dirty(); i think just bind() should be > enough. If it's not perhaps we should make it mark the session dirty, > as it is imho pretty obvious that something have changed in the > session so that you want to bind it. Yeah, that would be a solution. Igor? Eelco
