How about automatically removing all users (except for those that will continue to monitor the list, and perhaps nable) and not allowing anyone else to sign up?
Maurice On 8/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We already have that in place: every day anyone posts to wicket-user@ > he'll get an auto-response telling the mailinglist is shutting down. > However, the message still gets through. > > I'm trying to stop that last part too, but am not sure if the > auto-response is sent *before* the moderation has occurred. > > Martijn > > On 8/5/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there anyway to setup an autoresponder on the sf.net side? > > > > On 8/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I see that we get less and less messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > So I propose to put emergency moderation to effectively shut the list > > > down completely. > > > > > > I think we need a couple of additional moderators to monitor the list > > > and reply to messages sent to wicket-user telling them to resend to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone up for that? > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Nick Heudecker > > Professional Wicket Training & Consulting > > http://www.systemmobile.com > > > > Eventful - Intelligent Event Management > > http://www.eventfulhq.com > > > > > -- > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ >
