tbh, i didn't even realize that there were 'stuff-mailing lists.
and posts like [0] didn't even let me come up with the idea to look for
wicketstuff specific mailing lists ;)

maybe some "rules" or rather guidelines

[0]
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-stuff-GMap%3A-New-Exciting-Features%3A%29-tf3726142.html#a10428027

On 8/14/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with using the Apache-based lists for Wicket Stuff.  I don't think
> the traffic is high enough to warrant dedicated mailing lists and it's
> easy
> to use subject line prefixes, like "[TinyMCE] ...", for non-core
> discussions.
>
> On 8/14/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know this is a touchy feely issue and we have discussed this over
> > again. With the migration of Wicket to Apache, the wicket stuff
> > projects are more remotely administered than before. All the Wicket
> > mailling lists have been migrated to Apache lists, and our community
> > is gathering steam again at our new home.
> >
> > There is one thing that still troubles me: the wicket stuff projects
> > and the mailing lists of the project.
> >
> > Wicket stuff can't live currently without the main wicket lists. The
> > main lists (dev, commits, users) have a solid user base and that base
> > needs to be informed about new initiatives, new releases etc.
> >
> > Personally I really don't mind having the discussion concerning 'stuff
> > projects on our Apache lists, in fact I prefer that, because it keeps
> > the community together, and allows us to keep monitoring the projects
> > for possible inclusion at Apache. Furthermore, most of the projects
> > are maintained by core members, so it is odd to have discussions on
> > separate lists, where even discussions may have consequences to the
> > other project.
> >
> > I propose the following bold move:
> >
> >     shut down the wicket-stuff lists in favor of the apache based lists.
> >
> > If the 'stuff discussions get out of hand we can always divide and
> > conquer. For now, these projects need more involvement and publicity.
> > This can only happen if they are exposed to the grander wicket
> > community.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nick Heudecker
> Professional Wicket Training & Consulting
> http://www.systemmobile.com
>
> Eventful - Intelligent Event Management
> http://www.eventfulhq.com
>

Reply via email to