+1 On 9/24/07, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al Maw wrote: > > Ate Douma wrote: > >> Al Maw wrote: > >>> Gwyn Evans wrote: > >>>> On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 11:28:02 AM, Martijn > >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I would feel more confident in the outcome when Al has had his looksy > >>>>> on sunday. Shall we at least extend the vote until then? Typical votes > >>>>> run for 72 hours, so it wouldn't delay too much if we extend it until > >>>>> sunday evening or so. If Al hasn't been able to check it on sunday, I > >>>>> don't see a reason for further delay though. > >>>> > >>>> No problem with extending here, I just felt that as the discussion had > >>>> dried up, even pending Al's review it would be worth trying to get an > >>>> idea of the feelings either way sooner rather than later. > >>> > >>> I'll try to do a review later tonight. I've had a quick look, and > >>> it's all good so far... ;-) > >> > >> Al, > >> > >> Any update? > >> > >> The voting period formally has already expired, although personally I > >> don't very much care about that. > >> But I think many of the Wicket committers are waiting on your findings > >> before they vote so it would be good to know when you expect to have > >> them. > > > > OK, I'm now +1 on this. Paths through things look sensible, and I think > > it touches sufficiently little to be manageable. We should merge it, do > > some testing, and push out a beta4. > Great! > > Thanks Al for the good news. > > I'll wait a little while (say until tomorrow morning CET) to let others > "chime in" (or otherwise of course). > But with already +5 binding and +2 non-binding it looks like I can go ahead :) > > As I already have upgraded my patch to the current trunk and kept in sync > with newer commits I can merge this in now quickly. > > Regards, > > Ate > > > > > Regards, > > > > Al > > > >
-- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
