I don't think you're missing anything. Yes, I could do that. :-)
My real questions are 1) is there a better way, and 2) if not, and if I
were to implement this, does anybody have opinions on how to set it up
so that it will be useful to the widest audience possible? I imagine
that somebody, somewhere, would have a use for this functionality. I
would like to make it reusable and contribute it back--the project
deserves my help. But I'm too new to Wicket to be 100% certain that I
know the "right way" to do it.
That's why I posted to the dev list. Plenty of folks here should know
the right/most widely applicable way to do it.
Thanks for your response!
--Matt
Maeder Thomas wrote:
Hi Matt,
Perhaps I'm missing something, but why don't you just make your own
IWizardModel implementation? It would hold your wizard steps and
subwizards and map whatever behaviour you want to the IWizardModel
interface.
Thomas
