yes i think we should just make beta builds. I don't mind that we get beta5 and or beta6 also before rc1/rc2 and then the final.. Thats more up to the persons who have to build them ..
And i see that currently everything is building in bamboo. johan On 9/25/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMHO we should prepare ourselves for a beta5 now that we have accepted > portlet support, which (hopefully) will get some field testing with the > beta4 release. That doesn't change the fact that we should aim for a beta4 > that is more stable, better, etc. than beta3. So if there are serious > issues, then they should be fixed before it's released. > > Frank > > On 9/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I still see a lot of unresolved issues, that are breakers for 1.3 > > final IMO. For example stateless pages in combination with forms seem > > unusable, at least looking at the issues. I think that needs to be > > solved before we consider releasing the final beta. Or we need to plan > > another one, or just bite the bullet and go into RC after this, fixing > > the issues along the way. > > > > The last snapshot was published on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:06:11 GMT, also > > not a very good indicator of stability. > > > > Martijn > > > > On 9/25/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Heyall > > > > > > With the portlet support approaching, is it possible for me to do a > > release > > > on sunday? > > > > > > /Frank > > > > > > > > > -- > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ > > >
