just waiting for you to check it in johan!

-igor


On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> there where a lot of +1
> are we going to change this?
> Or better let it be configureable?
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On 10/3/07, Serge! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1
> > Sounds like an important feature. We tried to get rid of wicket:xxx
> meat,
> > and we ended up copy-pasting UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor. However,
> > stateless forms still provide bad URLs (and URL compression does not
> work
> > for them at all). Form URLs will not be easy to fix, as some encoding
> > stuff
> > is done inside RequestTarget itself. Hacking this looks even more ugly
> > now.
> > Of course we may go ahead with just patching Wicket sources...
> > Regards,
> > Sergey.
> >
> >
> > Al Maw wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Although some people don't really care what their URLs look like, lots
> > > of people do.
> > >
> > > If you use UrlCompressingWebCodingStrategy you can get the actual
> > > parameter values for interface/behaviour/etc. URLs looking pretty
> small
> > > and inoffensive.
> > >
> > > But the name is still something large, like "wicket:interface". I'm
> > > wondering if for 1.3 we could replace that with just:
> > >
> > > wicket:interface        --> w:i
> > > wicket:behaviourId      --> w:b
> > > wicket:bookmarkablePage --> w:p
> > > wicket:pageMapName      --> w:m
> > >
> > > It'd make the URLs shorter and not really any less comprehensible
> (this
> > > stuff only really means anything to people who understand the
> internals
> > > anyway).
> > >
> > > It'd make things very marginally quicker (less string matching).
> > >
> > > In short, I can't really see any disadvantage to it, other than that
> it
> > > will break any existing bookmarks to non-mounted pages. I'm pretty
> sure
> > > that the upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 breaks these anyway.
> > >
> > > It's a trivial fix (just update the constants in
> > > WebRequestCodingStrategy and a bunch of expected unit test results).
> > >
> > > What do people think?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alastair Maw
> > > Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/wicket%3Ainterface%2C-etc.-in-generated-URLs-tf4142021.html#a13027542
> > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to