On 10/16/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, tbh, I don't know either. I think it's supposed to handle a > failure such as server not responding right now. I know before It > handled even exceptions, but i guess it's better to just display the > error page as we would normally do (which is current behavior).
Does that mean that callback is obsolete now then? Eelco
