Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > Igor said "things we do not expect" which imho I can see as covering 2 and > 3 > - anyway in this case it appears that there is actually a need for > extensibility, > which would put these classes under case 1) and therefore not-final... >
If Igor agrees that it is covering 2) and 3), then this point is settled. Obviously now it is found that ZeroPaddingConverter needs extensibility and thus belong to 1), but then what is the supporting that *all* converters need extensibility and thus belong to 1)? ----- -- Kent Tong Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/anyone-disagree--tp14268271p14293835.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
