On Jan 11, 2008 10:05 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 for separate project regardless of the outcome.  Tapestry,
> hibernate, and spring are all examples of projects that provide the
> *option* to use annotations if you want.


But those projects ended up adding the annotation option because they had
something ugly like XML configuration hell that they were trying to improve
upon. Wicket does not.

On Jan 11, 2008 4:02 AM, Maeder Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'd like to chime in on the conservative side here. I believe you should
> only introduce a completely new way of doing things if there is a CLEAR
> benefit to be had.


Exactly.

Jon

Reply via email to