On 1/25/08, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Had a little discussion here: > http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=276&thread=223133 > > James mentions that he found the fact that the examples' pages extend > base classes confusing. And I can actually imagine that. > > WDYT, should we change part of our examples, or give more explanation > up-front, or do we keep what we have?
Don't change the examples. We should document the code better, and possibly restructure some of the content such that they aren't confusing. But we should strive to keep a consistent layout throughout the examples and make them look good. Documentation of the examples could/should be improved to make sure newbies are not at a loss. Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
