isnt the difference that wicket13doc is just wicket, while tim's is
the merge across all modules?

-igor

On Feb 10, 2008 7:09 AM, Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that Tim can stop his sync-ing and generation of
> > JavaDocs on
> > the p.a.o site?
> > Do we link to this directory on our website anywhere?
> >
>
> I think you should change the link on the site to point to 
> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc
> .
>
>
> I'll leave my cron running, it is generated off of trunk, so it will
> diverge from the released version over time.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 2/9/08, Igor Vaynberg (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>  [
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> >> ]
> >>
> >> Igor Vaynberg resolved WICKET-1306.
> >> -----------------------------------
> >>
> >> Resolution: Invalid
> >>   Assignee: Igor Vaynberg
> >>
> >> the link you point to is not our official javadoc
> >>
> >> our official javadoc is in the maven repo. if you want to view online
> >> there is a refreshed version here: wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc
> >>
> >> for fragment see here
> >>
> >>
> >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/panel/Fragment.html
> >>
> >>> CLONE - Correct javadoc for Fragment
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>             Key: WICKET-1306
> >>>             URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1306
> >>>         Project: Wicket
> >>>      Issue Type: Improvement
> >>>      Components: wicket
> >>> Affects Versions: 1.3.0-final
> >>>        Reporter: Craig McIlwee
> >>>        Assignee: Igor Vaynberg
> >>>        Priority: Minor
> >>>         Fix For: 1.3.2
> >>>
> >>> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> >>> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
> >>>
> >>> The Fragment constructors without markupProvider argument have been
> >> deprecated but the example in the class javadoc's is still using it.
> >>> CLONE:
> >>> This still not reflected in the javadocs that are linked from the
> >>> main
> >> project page (http://people.apache.org/~tobrien/wicket/apidocs/index.html
> >> )
> >>> In addition to the example using the deprecated constructors, the
> >> constructors themselves are not marked as deprecated in the
> >> documentation.
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >> -
> >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
>

Reply via email to