Your RAT report shows JavaScript files without license headers. Shouldn't they have them?
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my > p.a.oaccount: > > Distribution: > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/dist/ > > M2 Repo: > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/m2-repo/ > > RAT log file: > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.2/apache-wicket-1.3.2.rat > > The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here: > http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.1/KEYS > > As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything: > > - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (mac os x) > - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form, > ajax, pub, guice + some more. (mac os x, safari) > - Checked the RAT log > > > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.2 > [ ] Don't release, because... > > > Thank you in advance, > > Frank Bille >
