look at source of throwable.printstacktrace(), if they are not worried about it...
-igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you look at Strings.toString(Trowable) then it also checks that cause != > cause.getCause() :-) > > Frank > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > heh, i really really dont think so. > > > > if that was ever true you would have some huge log files because > > printing out a stacktrace would go into an infinite loop too :) > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > As far as I can see you would never get out of the loop because > > > cause.getCause() will at some point return itself if I remember > > correctly. > > > Frank > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > i attached a patch (untested) which solves it in a very general ways. > > > > let me know if you guys see any problems with it. > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > >
