Sure i can, but what is so horrible about PageLink that you want to
deprecate/remove it?
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you not have your own SecureLink variant?
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From a Wicket-Security point of view i like the PageLink and IPageLink
> > because it knows what pageclass is going to be instantiated and can
> > use that to check permissions.
> > If i were to use Link i would have to make that information somehow
> > available in another way. Although i would not mind if IPageLink gets
> > renamed.
> >
> > Maurice
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:16 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/16/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > my thought on this is to deprecate PageLink entirely, or at least the
> > > > entire IPageLink deal in case someone wants to have a add(new
> > > > PageLink("link", mypageinstance) construct.
> > > >
> > > > pagelink itself provides very little value, nothing a
> > > > BookmarkablePageLink or Link cannot do easily or better
> > > >
> > >
> > > Even better! :) I was trying to figure out how to tell folks to use
> > > PageLink rather than BookMarkablePageLink, especially since the
> > > version that takes a Page instance is deprecated. I think I'll
> > > completely remove PageLink from my presentation.
> > >
> >
>
