and bring back RequiredTextField, etc? -igor
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > true. otoh, a newbie may not know that. giving them a couple cancel button > subclasses would be very obvious. > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > especially since you can attach Link to <input type="button"/> or > > <button/> > > > > -igor > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> No objections (wouldn't dream of it the first day on the job :)) but > >> typically in our projects the cancelbutton is a pagelink to another > >> page, it never touches the form. Although i can see usecases where you > >> would want to be notified of a cancel i am not convinced it must be > >> through a formbutton. you might as well use a link to be notified of > >> that. > >> > >> Maurice > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > Even though this is another class and api bloat and everything I don't > >> > object actually. I had some hard time explaining people why should > >> > they call setDefaultFormProcessing(false) and what does it do so I > >> > think cancelbutton would be convenient to have. > >> > > >> > However, maybe others object more against additional two classes > >> > (yeah, we do have plenty of classes already :)). > >> > > >> > -Matej > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Jonathan Locke > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > i just got bit for at least the 3rd or 4th time by > >> > > setDefaultFormProcessing(). implementing a cancel button requires > >> that you > >> > > set this to false. this is a hard thing to know for a beginning > >> user. or > >> > > for me for that matter. ;-) i was wondering what everyone > >> thought about > >> > > adding AjaxCancelButton and CancelButton such that they > >> > > setDefaultFormProcessing(false). this would be a discoverable and > >> > > self-documenting way of dealing with this issue. true, it is > >> > > yet-another-class-in-core (or extensions would be fine), but i > >> think it > >> > > might be nice. > >> > > -- > >> > > View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/cancel-buttons-tp16083133p16083133.html > >> > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Resizable and reorderable grid components. > >> > http://www.inmethod.com > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/cancel-buttons-tp16083133p16085744.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
