well, yes! but the problem is when the form is submitted the enclosure is no longer there, because it is auto. further it is not in the hierarchy, whatever is inside is driven by markup only...
-igor On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > yeah, but didn't the original bug come from a form component that got a > value set on it when it was in an invisible enclosure? if the traversal > knew about these transparent enclosures, it could check their visibility > (they wouldn't be transparent to the traversal). then those form components > inside the enclosure would never be seen in form processing. isn't that > more correct? or am i still missing something? > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Jonathan Locke > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> i'm definitely jumping into the middle of this, but isn't the problem > >> that > >> the form component traversal is going into an auto markup container > >> that's > >> not visible? can't we change our traversal code to fix this? or am i > >> missing some key point? > > > > a) auto components only exist during render phase > > b) enclosure is transparent so it is not in the hierarchy, it is to a side > > > > -igor > > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> igor.vaynberg wrote: > >> > > >> > ive just attached a draft patch to WICKET-1391. its kinda hacky, so i > >> > want to see if anyone can come up with a more elegant way to do this. > >> > > >> > -igor > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-1391%3A-anyone-got-any-better-ideas--tp16323672p16344172.html > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-1391%3A-anyone-got-any-better-ideas--tp16323672p16345070.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
