Wouldn't it be simpler (from an application writer's perspective) to add
another application level setting, e.g. in IResourceSettings, that
ComponentStringResourceLoader would respect?
BTW,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Juergen Donnerstag <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jira-1436. To really fix it we'll need to make some API changes, which
> means it'll not go into 1.3.3. But to provide a solution to 1.3.3
> users we could introduce a simple solution (mark it as temporary)
> which will than change in 1.4 again. Currently
> ComponentStringResourceLoader contains a static constant
> "properties,xml" which is a comma separated list of file extensions.
> We simply must allow users to get and set it. Users would just call
> ComponentStringResourceLoader.setPropertyFileExtenstions("properties")
> and the problem would be solved. Of course you can not use any *.xml
> property files in the application than.
>
> WDYT? Should it go into 1.3.3?
>
> Juergen
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > gah, thats an interesting unintended side effect :) please file a jira
> issue...
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Mark Sandori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I am trying to use wicket to generate an XML file instead of an HTML
> file.
> > >
> > > I have no problem setting the correct markup type and using an XML
> file as
> > > the markup instead of an HTML file. I can get a basic XML file to
> generate
> > > without problems.
> > >
> > > However, if I try and use any <wicket:message> tags or anything that
> uses a
> > > Localizer, it doesn't work.
> > >
> > > This is because the localizer attempts to look for properties in
> both
> > > .properties and .xml files.
> > >
> > > The resolution process matches the page's markup file as an .XML
> properties
> > > file and attempts to load it. This of course breaks.
> > >
> > > So, if I want to generate an XML file, I can't use any wicket
> localization
> > > techniques.
> > >
> > > Do you have any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark.
> > >
> >
>
