id gladly trade a 10% increased chance of stack overflow if you can save 5 bytes!
-igor On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > only the serialization output, not in memory. > > But i guess i can revert that change so that we save 1 byte in the serial > output > Then we have now and then a stackoverflow under certain situations but i > guess that is way better yes.. > Maybe i can change it that way that i only save 1 byte maybe, maybe other > things also will stop working then in certain situations > but then we can store a lot of pages! > > /me starts calculating now how many then fit in a 500GB hd... > > johan > > > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 4/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - <td valign="top" align="left" nowrap><span > > wicket:id="size">414 bytes</span> </td> > > > + <td valign="top" align="left" nowrap><span > > wicket:id="size">415 bytes</span> </td> > > > > > - <td valign="top" align="left" nowrap><span > > wicket:id="size">415 bytes</span> </td> > > > + <td valign="top" align="left" nowrap><span > > wicket:id="size">416 bytes</span> </td> > > > > You increased the memory usage! Heretic!!! > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2 > > >
