true, unfortunately the jvm does not yet have a method to turn off
silly code. When it does suddenly a whole lot of application won't run
anymore ;)
Maurice
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that would be silly code :)
>
> But i dont mind to much, i just kept the null check to be sure.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you could still do add((IBehavior[])null) so the null check needs to stay.
> >
> > Maurice
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > is check on component:935 needed? can behaviors array ever be null?
> > > add((ibehavior)null) will give you ibehavior[]{null} no?
> > >
> > > -igor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > ok i committed it
> > > > Let see how this works then.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Johan Compagner <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I ask the same question on the meeting and there they pretty much
> > all
> > > > > said why not..
> > > > >
> > > > > So
> > > > > add(Component... child)
> > > > > add(IBehavior... behavior)
> > > > > add(IValidator... validator)
> > > > >
> > > > > Johan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
