So I guess when it comes down to it, if you plan on using wicket generics be
prepared to either right a lot of code that doesn't really make sense or
turn off all warnings for generics in your favorite ide.
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> this is fine yes:
>
> TextField<String> tf = new TextField<String>(new
> ResourceModel<String>("key"));
>
> the tf.getModel() returns a Model<String> else it cant and getModelObject
> also returns a String.
>
> But i agree for a Button if you dont give a model to it it doesn't make
> sense
> But if you give a model it does make sense.
>
> But for a Textfield it makes sense that you generify it even without a
> model
> because it does inherit the model from its parent..
>
> so yes its a bit of a split what is nice and what you want to do.
>
> johan
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:28 PM, mnwicket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Igor....not sure if you really answered what I was getting at
>> though.
>> I understand generics however there are cases in wicket where I'm
>> wondering
>> what is best practices.
>>
>> ie, using your example, a TextField using a ResourceModel, which way
>> would
>> you go;
>>
>> TextField<String> tf = new TextField<String>(new
>> ResourceModel<String>("key"));
>>
>> or just
>>
>> TextField tf = new TextField(new ResourceModel<String>("key"));
>>
>> And what do you use as a generic with the following code block;
>>
>> class MyForm extends Form {
>>
>> public MyForm() {
>>
>> add(new AjaxButton('id', this));
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>> >
>> > generic type on Component represents the type of the modelobject that
>> > component will hold.
>> >
>> > eg TextField<Integer> tf=new TextField<Integer>(...);
>> > means that tf.getModelObject() is of type Integer
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:30 PM, mnwicket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ok, so I starting messing around with the new generics version of
>> >> wicket....and I guess I was a little confused as to how many generics
>> >> there
>> >> are. Silly question is when people are doing development are they
>> >> turning
>> >> off all generic warnings in eclipse...that is if you are using
>> eclipse?
>> >>
>> >> I only ask because I come across components like TextField that takes
>> a
>> >> ResourceModel...I understand why the ResourceModel would use a
>> generic
>> >> but
>> >> in this case am I forced to put <String> on the TextField.
>> >>
>> >> Another example is AjaxButton that is being added to a form, what
>> >> generic do
>> >> I use here? The forms object model type? What if the form doesn't
>> have
>> >> a
>> >> model, say it is using a ValueMap that is a global member of the
>> >> form...ie
>> >> I've seen this usage in some login example of wicket.
>> >>
>> >> Just looking for some guidance here guys.
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/1.4-Generics-tp16819308p16819308.html
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/1.4-Generics-tp16819308p16824264.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/1.4-Generics-tp16819308p16834717.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
