However, iirc 2 folks from the core team have voted leave as is. Which would be enough to make this change controversial at best.
Apparently ONLY 6 folks think the usecase has some merit, but that is not enough to change such a widely used API in my opinion. More conclusive numbers have to be needed to convince me. Martijn On 5/1/08, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi sven, > > > > I wouldn't call 6 votes a reason to change an API. > > Count me on "Leave as is". > > > > a reason to change the api aren't 6 votes but use-cases. your argumentation > is somewhat 'destructive' (vote against cause there are only 6 votes in > favor). you could read the result as well as that all haven't voted don't > really care. > > regards, --- jan. > > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3
