hmm can this build message be improved:

builds.wicketstuff.org: Build Apache Wicket::Wicket 1.4.x #16 failed
(compilation failed)
Agent: Default agent
Build results:
http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewLog.html?buildId=52&buildTypeId=bt2

Compilation errors
==================
Compilation failure
/data/home/wicket/TeamCity/buildAgent/work/wicket-trunk/wicket/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/stateless/pages/UsernamePasswordSignInPanel.java:[119,39]
removePersistedFormData(java.lang.Class<? extends
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form<?>>,boolean) in
org.apache.wicket.Page<capture of ?> cannot be applied to
(java.lang.Class<org.apache.wicket.stateless.pages.UsernamePasswordSignInPanel.SignInForm>,boolean)
/data/home/wicket/TeamCity/buildAgent/work/wicket-trunk/wicket/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/stateless/pages/UsernamePasswordSignInPanel.java:[119,39]
removePersistedFormData(java.lang.Class<? extends
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form<?>>,boolean) in
org.apache.wicket.Page<capture of ?> cannot be applied to
(java.lang.Class<org.apache.wicket.stateless.pages.UsernamePasswordSignInPanel.SignInForm>,boolean)

WHO caused it!
That is what i want to see, dont care about the rest
So one simple message like this: "Build failed of project X caused by
ivaynberg"
thats good enough for me.

johan


On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> it is [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the exact same password as the ssh
> access.
>
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 5/4/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  But if it is just a jabber account also like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  bamboo used to use then that is also fine
> >
> > The biggest problem I see is that these accounts are not documented. I
> > didn't know we had a wicket stuff account already. And if I knew, then
> > I wouldn't know the password. See our wicket-pmc repository to add
> > such information that we, the wicket pmc, need to ensure continuity of
> > our project.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
>
>

Reply via email to