I thought it would break yes.
Will try to look at it, but i gues this will not be a really easy
change because component<T> isnt converter<T> any more.

On 5/19/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i tried it real quick and it breaks Component. i havent had time to
> try and fix it and going to be pretty busy tomorow, so if you have
> time give it a shot, if not i will when i get a chance.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> You can make that change, if you want.
>> Does it all compile if you change that?
>>
>> On 5/19/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> public interface IConverterLocator<T> extends IClusterable
>>> {
>>>       public IConverter<T> getConverter(Class<T> type);
>>> }
>>>
>>> doesnt make any sense, it should be
>>>
>>> public interface IConverterLocato extends IClusterable
>>> {
>>>       public <T> IConverter<T> getConverter(Class<T> type);
>>> }
>>>
>>> objections? johan you want to make that change since you worked on
>>> converter generics?
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to