I agree, that a large banner pointing to documents for current Wicket version would be a good idea. I also arrived at these old pages via Google, and it took me a while to understand that its' about older versions.
regards, Maarten On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Antony Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In that case I would suggest a large banner at the top of every page > proclaiming that fact, and a large link to the new site. > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> >> This has been discussed OVER and OVER. the 1.2, 1.1 and 1.0 websites >> are for archive purposes, and still available for Google to index! >> This is on purpose, exactly for those that come across an older Wicket >> based application. >> >> Martijn >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Antony Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Woah - that's old. >>> >>> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/faqs.html >>> >>> I know http://wicket.sourceforge.net/ redirects, but google still index's >>> it's sub content, and so points people there when looking up wicket >>> issues. >>> >>> Something needs to be done about that - perhaps redirect all requests to >>> that domain? Or simply remove the html content. >>> >>> Would you like me to create a Jira for it? >>> >>> ----- >>> ___________________________ >>> >>> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Sourceforge-page-needs-to-come-down-tp17616570p17616570.html >>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 >> >> > > > ----- > ___________________________ > > http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Sourceforge-page-needs-to-come-down-tp17616570p17617018.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
