That would be bloody brilliant! I am planning on using TC and Wicket very soon but assumed the integration was already working. This work will save me a lot of pain.
Ari Zilka wrote: > > Ok, > > a more productive response. Shall Richard and I bundle up Matej's > proposed updates to Richard's patch and contribute it back? How do I > go about contributing to Wicket? > > Thanks, > > --Ari > > On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:05 AM, richardwilko wrote: > >> >> >> >> Matej Knopp-2 wrote: >>> >>> What might be worth thinking of would be a terracotta based page >>> store >>> (extending AbstractPageStore - class that implements the >>> (de)serialization magic). But even so it would still be necessary to >>> cluster http session. >>> >> >> Thats what kind of what I was thinking, and if we store this >> TerracottaPageStore in the httpsession, rather than on disk a la >> DiskPageStore, then we can just use terracotta to distribute the >> httpsession >> as normal and everything *should* work >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18192381.html >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18197960.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
