Looks like I've changed my opinion after that... +1
Bruno Borges blog.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 "The glory of great men should always be measured by the means they have used to acquire it." - Francois de La Rochefoucauld On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Jörn Zaefferer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its part of html5: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-autocomplete-attribute > And every major browser already supports it. > > Jörn > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm having a tough time imagining why you'd want this under programmatic > > > > control. > > > > For dynamic user preferences. > > > > But your argument about this attribute not being part of HTML spec is > > reasonable. > > > > So, -1 for this... :-) > > > > Bruno > > > > On Nov 12, 2008 4:28pm, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> -1 for me. Why should we give special attention to this one particular > >> > >> attribute and not others, especially considering the autocomplete > >> > >> attribute isn't even in the HTML spec? > >> > >> > >> > >> Besides, for the times I've needed it I just put the attribute right > >> > >> in the HTML. I'm having a tough time imagining why you'd want this under > >> > >> programmatic control. > >> > >> > >> > >> jk > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:18:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> > Does anybody else thinks this is an interesting feature to be added? > If > >> > >> > yes, I will submit a patch. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > Bruno > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Nov 12, 2008 11:21am, James Carman wrote: > >> > >> > >Ahhhh, sorry. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> That's for Ajax... > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers handle > > > > by > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> themselves. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on > > > > different > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> projects > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > (for different customers), having to provide a subclass of > > > > TextField > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> with an > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > option to setAutocomplete(boolean) where it will add(or not) the > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > 'autocomplete' tag for during the componentTag method - > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > saving from creating an instance of AttributeModifier > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > What about adding that to TextField? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > Regards, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > Bruno > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >
