The issue is that it polls the SVN server, right? Switching to another polling CI server wouldn't help, really.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgive my ignorance in this since I haven't been paying a lotof attention > to all the TeamCity discussions... but since TC is our big problem (or the > marriage of TC and SF), have we tried switching to Continuum or similar? > What do we need to accomplish such a thing? Hardware? > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Im replying inline... >> >> Jeremy Thomerson wrote: >> >>> Nino, >>> Does this mean that you want all Wicket Stuff projects to move to Google >>> Code >>> >> No I do not, I'd want to try one or two projects first, that rely on >> teamcity (because we only have problems with teamcity). If we have problems >> with google code as well it would be a waste of resources switching. >> >>> because of the problems with the TeamCity builds and SourceForge? If >>> so, I'd be hesitant to do it this way. Here's a couple reasons why: >>> >>> 1. the very first sentence on your Google code page says that multiple >>> licenses are not allowed - I've always been under the impression that >>> one of >>> the reasons we had Wicket Stuff was so that integrations with >>> third-party >>> libraries (incompatible with Apache license) could be done there (just >>> one >>> reason) >>> >>> >> No there are several other reasons aswell, like the fact that the core devs >> do not maintain wicketstuff. But your point are very vaild, and some of the >> stuff projects uses libs that are incompatible with ASL... So if it should >> work this should be sorted out. >> >>> 2. We lose all code history - IF the switch were made, we should import >>> the old repository. >>> >>> >> Yes, and thats one of the reasons why I've been so reluctant to do this. >> >>> It seems like the community should vote on this before such a big change >>> is >>> made. Thoughts anyone? >>> >>> >> Yes I agree, and also feel that if anyone are up to the task of further >> talking with sourceforge this would probably be the way to go, one of my >> problems are that I do not have any administrative rights on the server >> where teamcity runs from so I cannot go further with teamcity since, they >> require details of that character. >> >> >> -- >> -Wicket for love >> >> Nino Martinez Wael >> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK >> http://www.jayway.dk >> +45 2936 7684 >> >> >
