-1,
I do not use it myself but as a user I would hate to see something
removed just because it allows to use JSP like constructs. Anyway, a
willing user could extend markup processing to define his/her own JSP
like tags and make them work in Wicket...
Cheers,
Ernesto
Bruno Cesar Borges wrote:
> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>
> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features will
> be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not freak
> everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.
>
> Example:
>
> # Java
> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>
> # HTML
> <ul wicket:id="menus">
> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
> </ul>
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> Cheers,
> Bruno
> ***************************************************************************************************
> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s)
> acima identificado(s),
> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e seu
> sigilo é protegido por
> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente e
> apague-a de seu sistema.
> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não
> refletem, necessariamente,
> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
> autorizadas."
>
>
> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above
> identified, possibly
> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose content
> is protected by law.
> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and delete
> it from your system.
> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination, distribution,
> copy or use without
> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do not
> necessarily reflect
> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
> ***************************************************************************************************
>
>
>
