Thanks Johan - add to that WICKET-1567 - which should be very safe because I simply ported code from trunk to 1.3 branch. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Johan Compagner <[email protected]>wrote: > I will look at them > > On 24/12/2008, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there anything special I need to do after submitting a patch for a bug > so > > that it gets included? Currently I have three patches submittted to > random > > bugs / requests, two of which have been there for quite some time with no > > comment and noone applying them. > > > > WICKET-1513 - bug that I think the patch is safe and should be committed > > WICKET-1916 - bug that I think the patch is safe and should be committed > > WICKET-1883 - I could see why this one may not be committed - it's huge, > and > > Igor's already said it would probably wait until 1.5 (which is a shame, > > because I'm sure by then the patch won't work any more). > > > > Anyway - since I worked to fix those bugs, I don't want to see them fall > > through the cracks and would like to see them make it into future > releases. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > >
