please spin off a different thread. -igor
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org> wrote: > Are there any plans on releasing 1.3.6 soon? > > Cheers > Peter > > Am 05.02.2009 um 02:22 schrieb Ate Douma: > >> [X] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2 >> >> Ate >> >> Frank Bille Jensen wrote: >>> >>> Hey all, >>> This is the second try on the 1.4-rc2. The first try was cancelled due to >>> code errors. >>> I have build the second release candidate of version 1.4 and put it on >>> my p.a.o account for you to test. >>> Distribution: >>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2/dist/ >>> Maven repo: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2/m2-repo/ >>> RAT >>> log: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2.rat.log >>> The >>> artifacts has been build and signed by me, so use this KEYS file to verify >>> that they have not been modified along the way: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2/dist/KEYS >>> It's >>> the usual procedure: We, as a community (and specially the PMC members) are >>> to make sure that the release is solid both technically but also legally. >>> Therefore if you have the time here some examples on what to test in the >>> release: >>> - Run "mvn clean install" in the distribution to make sure that it >>> builds, tests run without failures and installs correctly in you >>> environment. >>> - Run "mvn jetty:run" in the wicket-examples directory in the >>> distribution to run a jetty server with the examples. Then point a browser >>> to http://localhost:8080/wicket-examples and click around. The more >>> browsers/operating system combinations the better. >>> - Look through the RAT log to see if there is anything that looks wrong >>> in terms of which files should have a license header. >>> - Verify the signatures of the files matches my public key. >>> - Try out the maven repo with your project to see if it works as >>> expected. >>> - Look through the distribution in general to see that it looks as >>> expected and that the files there contain what is expected (this is a bit >>> vague, but follow your intuition. And YES, this time the javadocs ARE >>> included.. so please check them as well) >>> [ ] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2 >>> [ ] No, don't release because.... > >
