El mié, 22-04-2009 a las 09:57 -0500, Craig Tataryn escribió:
> I love git but I think since you need to run msys or cygwin on Windows  
> in order to use it (granted the bloke who wrote jGit did a great job,  
> so that opens it up to IDEs) it alienates a lot of developers who  
> develop on Windows.  This is why (I think) open source projects tend  
> to side with hg if they decide to go dscm, which is a shame, I  
> honestly think git is the superior product.
> 
> With projects like Wicket (and a majority of my client's projects) I  
> typically keep a local git repo of the code, do my branching and stuff  
> locally then just "git svn dcommit" my changes back up to the svn  
> server.
I'm using hg the very same way.
hg_svn_mix$ hgimportsvn <someSVNRepo>
pure_hg$ hg clone hg_svn_mix
pure_hg$ (hg xyz + some fun with hg mq)
pure_hg$ hg ci; hg push
hg_svn_mix$ hg up; svn ci

it is a real time-saver for making feature branches, working on
submarine projects, etc...
> 
> Craig.
> 
> --
> Craig Tataryn
> site: http://www.basementcoders.com/
> podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders
> irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin
> twitter: craiger
> 
> On 22-Apr-09, at 7:24 AM, Martin Funk wrote:
> 
> > and wicket is mirrored too :-)
> >
> > just a > git clone git://git.apache.org/wicket.git
> >
> > and wicket was on my drive.
> >
> > Very nice, that's sure get git a little higher up on my list.
> >
> > Did anyone follow the history of that? Are thoes mirrors there to  
> > stay, or
> > may they be just a temporry engagement?
> >
> > How about mentioning it on wicket.apache.org?
> >
> > mf
> 

Reply via email to