On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> wrote: > The problems with svn don't stem from apache, but rather sf.net. > Right, DUH! :) I'm just trying to make sure we don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
> It might have been the specific configuration where one svn root was > shared with all projects, which is specific to teamcity. > Could be. But, this is quite convenient, no?
