That would be great!
A colleague has been voicing the exact same modularization (not related
to Wicket). He would certainly start using it.
Regards,
Erik.
James Carman wrote:
I've tried pushing through the runtime implementation resolution
(similar to slf4j), but nobody seems keen on it. At least, they
didn't answer my emails. So, perhaps I'll just refactor it myself and
put it out there and see what happens?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Johan Compagner<[email protected]> wrote:
this we already kind of have.
But it uses currently proxies. And is build on commons proxy that wants us
to hard code the proxie implementation
that you should use, thats in my eyes a wrong implementations, the whole
point of a wrapping class around a proxy
is that i dont want to choose at compile time which one i want!
But our property model can do what you are describing just fine.
johan
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
